Kenya is country bleeding on so many fronts
– both literally and metaphorically. But it is also a country crying for a
re-birth of Nationalism, ideals and vision. We should as a country decide
whether we want to break down into ethnic fiefdoms or we want a new Kenya, where
every single person has equal rights and responsibilities. And that is EVERY
SINGLE KENYAN regardless of tribe, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation
or any such non-essential differentiators.
Every single Kenyan!
This would call on us to create inclusive
and fairer political system in which every individual, whether a devout
Christian, devout Muslim or one who does not believe in any religion, feels as
being equal and full stakeholder in the Kenyan citizenship. This calls for
governance systems and structures that distribute state resources evenly among
Kenyans of all walks of lives, all ages, and ethnic groups. No one, absolutely
no one should feel alienate d in the new political dispensation. All should
share in this Kenyan Utopia.
About
John Mathenge
John Mathenge and his group HOYMAS do not
feel included in this Utopia. Let me tell you something about John Mathenge. I
remember when John Mathenge walked into the office. He had called earlier to
ask for an appointment. There were people who were not happy that he had
recently relocated from Mombasa to Nairobi. They did not want me to give him a
hearing – but as a leader of a National coalition (GALCK), one does not have
the luxury choosing who to work or not work with.
Mathenge had this idea of starting a rescue
and nutritional centre for people (gay men and other men who have sex with men –
MSM mainly) living with HIV. Mathenge noted that adherence to treatment on
empty stomachs or when living on the streets was near impossible. What I did
was to task Mathenge to start this group, promising to offer him the support he
needed. He started the group and it’s known as HOYMAS.
Today HOYMAS is one of the few groups – and certainly the only MSM group that offers opportunity for persons living with HIV to adhere to treatment by providing for safe keeping for the HIV drugs. HOYMAS also offers comradeship necessary for treatment adherence. HOYMAS has managed to break the stigma that comes with being on treatment.
The
Attack
But all this calm was brought to a halt
last Friday. A group of hired young men broke into the HOYMAS offices,
destroyed property and even called on neighbours and passers by claiming that
HOYMAS was spreading homosexuality. About 150 people surrounded the office to
witness the spectacle. The police arrested the ringleader, but later released
him on a free bond. There are unverified rumours that while the assailant was in
custody, he was visited by the leaders of Maendeleo
ya Wanaume and it is they who secured his release.
Yet when Mathenge went to follow on the
issue the police now threatened to detain him. John was saved by high level
calls to senior government officials in the ministry of health, UNAIDS and
luckily for John, a few friends that he has in the police department.
How
is this related to Mpeketoni Terrorist (or political) Attacks
It takes a keen observer to note the basic mould
of the HOYMAS attack is informed by the same security weaknesses and
vulnerability to moral vigilantism that afflicts Kenya on a National scale. In
HOYMAS case, the attack were motivated by the clossing of ranks between
anti-gay groups such as Maendeleo ya
Wanaume, and gay blackmailers. Realizing that anti-gay groups are willing
to pay a price for hunting down gays in Kenya, the black-mailers are now
working for such groups. For the anti-gay groups, working with the blackmailers
is a question of the end justifying the means.
Yet, is this not the same reasoning that
informs the murderous gangs that kill people in Mpeketoni and other terrorist
attacks? How is it possible that an individual or a group can go around killing
others with absolute impunity? – The End Justifies The Means! But this is possible because of a number of
factors unique to Kenyans:
- The mainstreaming of the view that other people are “lesser than” therefore their lives are expendable. The view that others are “lesser than” could be on account of their tribal affiliation, religious or moral affiliation or in the case of HOYMAS, sexual orientation.
- The mainstreaming of protection for “our criminals.” These could be the tribal corruption lords, the moral vigilantes that beat up gay people and women who dress in certain styles or it could be politicians from our tribe.
- The “outsourcing” of our capacity for agency and reasoning to local political thugs. These have no respect for our constitution especially the National values and principles of governance.
What
do we do?
I think the answer to our problems is very
simple. As a country we are ethnically and religiously divided because of poor
leadership. The leadership has failed to unite the country, since we have
chosen to hold on to the view that others are “lesser than,” we are willing to protect
“our criminals” even as we “outsource” our reasoning capacity to these “criminals.”
We can easily dismantle the hegemony of
these “criminals” by asserting as our constitution does in Article 27, the
dignity of every person in Kenya. That regardless of their tribal affiliation,
regardless of their religious or moral affiliation, regardless of their sexual
orientation (and yes we need to start using this phrase as a metaphor of inclusivity) ALL Kenyans have equal dignity, due to
them as human beings.
This will then call for us to create governance
systems and structures that distribute state resources evenly among Kenyans of
all walks of lives, all ages, all religions and ethnic groups. No one,
absolutely no one should feel alienate d in this political dispensation. All
should share in this Kenyan Utopia.
Distressfully precise commonality!
ReplyDeleteGood case of the dispensable "lessers"...
Still... we rise. Our strength is in our resilience and optimism. Kenya will be better. We must continue to point out our missteps to each other as you have done here for us. Amidst the hate and unmanaged security, we must agitate, collectively, strongly and unapologetically, for the human rights utopia owed to us by the State...
Until the fat lady sings.
Thanks Leonard for the feedback. I certainly agree with you on our resilience, optimism and even strength. One of our weakness however, is to assume that we do not have power, both as individuals and collectives to change the status-quo. This is best exemplified in our "tunaomba serikali" instead of "niwajibu wa serikali." The middle-class on the other hand, is stands like a "deer in headlights" often be-mourning that their own individual actions will not bring change - they are paralyzed by "marginal effect" of their actions instead of "tipping point" effect that such actions can have. We need to push the "tipping point" mentality in our circles of influence.
Delete